ACL Rehabilitation Strength Testing: Protocols, Benchmarks, and Return-to-Sport Criteria
Markus Johnson
Author
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is one of the most common orthopedic procedures, with over 200,000 surgeries performed annually in the United States alone. Despite advances in surgical technique, re-injury rates remain concerning — approximately 1 in 4 young athletes who return to cutting and pivoting sports will sustain a second ACL injury within two years.
The strongest predictor of re-injury? Insufficient quadriceps strength restoration. This guide provides evidence-based strength testing protocols and criteria for each phase of ACL rehabilitation.
The Quadriceps Strength Problem
After ACL reconstruction, quadriceps strength loss is profound and persistent:
- 2 weeks post-op: Quadriceps strength is typically 20–40% of the uninvolved side
- 3 months: 50–60% LSI (still a 40–50% deficit)
- 6 months: 70–80% LSI
- 9 months: 80–90% LSI
- 12 months: Many patients still have not achieved 90% LSI
Research shows that quadriceps LSI below 90% at the time of return to sport is associated with a 3x higher risk of re-injury. Yet many athletes are cleared based on time alone ("you're 9 months out, you're good to go") without objective strength testing.
Testing Equipment
You don't need an expensive isokinetic dynamometer to perform reliable ACL strength testing. A handheld dynamometer with belt fixation provides excellent reliability (ICC > 0.95) at a fraction of the cost.
For a complete ACL testing battery, we recommend:
- Handheld dynamometer: For isometric knee extension and flexion strength testing
- Digital goniometer: For precise ROM measurement, especially knee extension deficit monitoring
- Force plates: For jump testing (CMJ, single-leg hop) at later rehabilitation phases
Phase-by-Phase Strength Testing Protocol
Phase 1: Acute Post-Operative (Weeks 0–2)
Focus: ROM restoration, quad activation
ROM targets:
- Knee extension: 0° (full extension) — this is the #1 priority
- Knee flexion: 90° by end of week 2
Strength testing: Not appropriate at this stage. Focus on quad activation (quad sets, straight leg raises). Monitor for ability to perform a strong quad set without extension lag.
Key measurement: Use a digital goniometer to precisely measure extension deficit. Any extension deficit >5° at 2 weeks requires aggressive intervention.
Phase 2: Early Rehabilitation (Weeks 2–6)
Focus: ROM normalization, progressive strengthening
ROM targets:
- Knee extension: 0° (must be achieved and maintained)
- Knee flexion: 120° by week 4, full flexion by week 6
Strength testing: Begin isometric quad testing at week 4 if pain-free
| Test | Position | Target LSI | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Isometric knee extension | Seated, 60° flexion | Baseline measurement | Pain-free only; submaximal if needed |
| Isometric knee flexion | Prone, 30° flexion | Baseline measurement | Hamstring graft patients: defer to week 6 |
Phase 3: Strengthening Phase (Weeks 6–12)
Focus: Progressive strengthening, movement quality
Testing frequency: Every 4 weeks
| Test | Position | 6-Week Target | 12-Week Target |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knee extension (quads) | Seated, 60° flexion | ≥50% LSI | ≥65% LSI |
| Knee flexion (hamstrings) | Prone, 30° flexion | ≥60% LSI | ≥75% LSI |
| Hip abduction | Side-lying | ≥70% LSI | ≥85% LSI |
| Hip extension | Prone | ≥70% LSI | ≥85% LSI |
Clinical decision point at 12 weeks: If quad LSI is below 60%, investigate barriers (pain, swelling, inhibition, compliance) and consider adjusting the rehabilitation program before progressing.
Phase 4: Advanced Strengthening (Months 3–6)
Focus: Power development, functional progression
Testing frequency: Monthly
| Test | 4-Month Target | 6-Month Target |
|---|---|---|
| Knee extension (quads) | ≥75% LSI | ≥80% LSI |
| Knee flexion (hamstrings) | ≥80% LSI | ≥85% LSI |
| H:Q ratio | ≥0.55 | ≥0.60 |
| Single-leg squat quality | Good control, no valgus | Equal to uninvolved |
Add at 4–5 months (if quad LSI >70%):
- Bilateral CMJ on force plates — assess peak force symmetry
- Begin monitoring jump height progression
Phase 5: Return-to-Sport Preparation (Months 6–9+)
Focus: Sport-specific training, RTS testing
| Test | 7-Month Target | RTS Criterion |
|---|---|---|
| Knee extension (quads) | ≥85% LSI | ≥90% LSI (≥95% for elite) |
| Knee flexion (hamstrings) | ≥85% LSI | ≥90% LSI |
| H:Q ratio | ≥0.60 | ≥0.60 |
| CMJ height | ≥80% LSI | ≥90% LSI |
| Single-leg hop | ≥80% LSI | ≥90% LSI |
| Drop jump RSI | — | ≥85% LSI |
| Knee extension ROM | 0° (full) | 0° (no deficit) |
| Knee flexion ROM | Within 5° of uninvolved | Within 5° of uninvolved |
| ACL-RSI score | — | ≥70/100 |
Testing Protocol: Step-by-Step
Isometric Knee Extension Test (Quadriceps)
- Position: Patient seated on a firm treatment table, hips and knees at 60° flexion, trunk upright
- Fixation: Belt around the table and patient's thigh for stabilization. Dynamometer attached distally on the shin (5 cm above the ankle malleoli)
- Warm-up: 2 submaximal contractions at 50% and 75% effort
- Test: 3 maximal isometric contractions, hold for 5 seconds each
- Rest: 30 seconds between contractions
- Cue: "Kick out as hard as you possibly can! Hold it! Keep pushing!"
- Record: Peak force from each trial. Calculate LSI using the highest value.
- Test uninvolved side first, then involved side
LSI Calculation
LSI = (Involved limb peak force ÷ Uninvolved limb peak force) × 100
Example: Involved quad = 280 N, Uninvolved quad = 340 N → LSI = (280/340) × 100 = 82.4%
H:Q Ratio Calculation
H:Q ratio = Hamstring peak force ÷ Quadriceps peak force (on the same limb)
Example: Involved hamstring = 180 N, Involved quad = 280 N → H:Q = 180/280 = 0.64 (adequate)
Red Flags During ACL Rehabilitation
These findings during testing warrant investigation and potential program modification:
- Extension deficit >3° at any point after 6 weeks: Requires immediate attention (aggressive stretching, possible manual therapy)
- Quad LSI not improving between testing sessions: Investigate pain, effusion, fear-avoidance, compliance
- H:Q ratio <0.50: Isolated hamstring strengthening needed
- Increasing pain or effusion during the strengthening phase: Reduce load and reassess
- ACL-RSI score <56: Psychological readiness is a barrier — consider referral for sports psychology
Documentation Template
For each testing session, record:
| Metric | Uninvolved | Involved | LSI | Target | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quad peak force (N) | ___ | ___ | ___% | ≥90% | Pass / Fail |
| Hamstring peak force (N) | ___ | ___ | ___% | ≥90% | Pass / Fail |
| H:Q ratio (involved) | — | ___ | — | ≥0.60 | Pass / Fail |
| Knee extension ROM | ___° | ___° | Δ ___° | 0° deficit | Pass / Fail |
| Knee flexion ROM | ___° | ___° | Δ ___° | ≤5° deficit | Pass / Fail |
| CMJ height (cm) | ___ | ___ | ___% | ≥90% | Pass / Fail |
Conclusion
ACL rehabilitation is not complete when the calendar says it is. It's complete when objective testing confirms that the athlete has restored sufficient strength, power, and movement quality to safely return to their sport. A handheld dynamometer, digital goniometer, and force plates give you the tools to make these decisions with confidence — protecting your athletes and your professional judgment.
Test early. Test often. Let the data guide the return.

Featured Product
EasyForce Digital Dynamometer
Handheld muscle strength testing with 99% accuracy. Used in 40+ peer-reviewed studies.
Learn More