10 Best Practices for Data Collection in Modern Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Science

In modern physiotherapy and performance science, the shift from subjective assessment to objective, quantifiable data is the cornerstone of evidence-based practice. Clinical decisions once guided by subjective feel are now being replaced or augmented by precise, reproducible measurements. This evolution is critical, as it addresses the inherent limitations of subjective evaluation, such as poor inter-rater reliability and susceptibility to bias, which have been well-documented in clinical literature [1].

Adopting robust best practices for data collection allows clinicians to track longitudinal progress with greater accuracy, justify clinical decisions with defensible evidence, and deliver superior patient outcomes. Moving beyond traditional manual muscle testing or visual range of motion estimates toward instrumented measurement is essential for modern practice. For example, using a dedicated digital goniometer or clinical-grade handheld dynamometer provides quantifiable data that supports a higher standard of care and improves documentation quality.

This article outlines 10 evidence-based best practices for collecting data in physiotherapy, rehabilitation, and performance settings. We will provide a direct framework for integrating objective measurement into your daily workflow, covering everything from protocol standardization to using validated technology and ensuring data integrity. By mastering these principles, practitioners can build a system that strengthens clinical reasoning, improves documentation, and reinforces the central theme of modern practice: that clinical decisions improve when supported by objective, reproducible measurement.

Evidence-Based Clinical Overview

Modern physiotherapy and performance practice depend on objective, reliable, and reproducible measurement. Subjective assessments, while having a place in building patient rapport, are limited by poor inter-rater and intra-rater reliability. For example, manual muscle testing (MMT) is known to have a ceiling effect and lacks the sensitivity to detect small but clinically significant changes in strength [2]. In contrast, quantifiable data from validated tools like handheld dynamometers or force plates provides the precision necessary for modern clinical decision-making. Standardized testing protocols are essential to ensure that this data is reliable, allowing for accurate longitudinal tracking and informed adjustments to rehabilitation programs. This commitment to objective data is fundamental to elevating the quality and defensibility of clinical practice.

1. Establish Standardized Measurement Protocols

The foundation of reliable data collection in any clinical or performance setting is protocol standardization. This involves creating and consistently applying a detailed, step-by-step procedure for every assessment. The primary goal is to minimize variability that arises from differences in technique between clinicians (inter-rater) or from the same clinician across different sessions (intra-rater). Without this consistency, it becomes nearly impossible to determine if a change in a patient's measurement reflects a true clinical improvement or simply a variation in testing procedure.

Practical Testing Considerations

Standardized protocols directly support evidence-based practice by ensuring that data is both reproducible and comparable. This is essential for tracking patient progress objectively over time, justifying clinical decisions, and meeting documentation requirements. For example, an orthopedic clinic using a digital inclinometer system for knee range of motion (ROM) must have a protocol that specifies patient positioning (e.g., supine, hip neutral), anatomical landmark identification for device placement, and the exact movement to be performed. This ensures that a 5-degree increase in knee flexion at week six post-op is a genuine gain, not a measurement artifact.

Key Insight: A measurement is only as reliable as the protocol used to obtain it. Inconsistent procedures introduce noise that obscures true patient progress and undermines clinical decision-making.

Practical Implementation Strategies

• Create Visual Guides: Develop clear, accessible reference materials like laminated posters or instructional videos. These should visually demonstrate patient positioning, device placement, and correct execution for each test, based on established evidence.
• Integrate into Training: Make protocol review a mandatory part of new staff onboarding and annual competency assessments. This reinforces the importance of standardization from day one.
• Conduct Audits: Schedule regular, informal audits where clinicians observe each other performing key assessments. This peer-review process helps identify and correct procedural drift before it becomes habitual.
• Document and Communicate Changes: If a protocol needs to be updated based on new evidence or clinical feedback, document the change formally and ensure it is distributed to all staff through team meetings and updated reference materials. Detailed information on specific testing procedures, such as those for ACL recovery, can provide a great template. Learn more about developing ACL rehabilitation strength testing protocols and benchmarks for a real-world example.

2. Use Calibrated and Validated Measurement Instruments

Beyond standardized protocols, the integrity of clinical data depends directly on the quality of the tools used. Selecting measurement instruments that are not only accurate but also scientifically validated and regularly calibrated is a cornerstone of evidence-based practice. A validated tool has been proven to measure what it purports to measure (validity), consistently and with minimal error (reliability), while calibration ensures its accuracy is maintained over time. This is one of the most critical best practices for data collection, as even the best protocol cannot compensate for a faulty or unreliable device.

Practical Testing Considerations

Using validated, clinical-grade instruments ensures that the data you collect is defensible, reliable, and clinically meaningful. This is essential for confident decision-making, tracking true biological change, and providing robust documentation. For instance, a sports medicine clinic clearing an athlete for return to play based on limb symmetry index requires force plate data that is accurate. If the force plates are not calibrated, a reported 5% asymmetry might actually be 15%, placing the athlete at significant risk of re-injury. Similarly, replacing subjective manual muscle testing with a calibrated clinical-grade handheld dynamometer provides objective force output (in Newtons or kilograms-force) that can be reliably tracked from session to session. Smartphone-based tools, while accessible, lack the validation and accuracy of dedicated medical devices and should not be considered equivalent alternatives.

Key Insight: Data is only as trustworthy as the instrument that collects it. Unvalidated or uncalibrated tools introduce systematic error, creating a false picture of a patient's status and undermining clinical judgment.

Practical Implementation Strategies

• Request Validation Evidence: Before purchasing a device, ask the manufacturer for its validation studies, which should ideally be published in peer-reviewed journals, demonstrating accuracy, reliability (e.g., ICC > 0.90), and sensitivity.
• Establish a Calibration Schedule: Create and follow a strict calibration schedule for all measurement devices, typically annually for most clinical-grade instruments. Maintain a log and keep calibration certificates for compliance audits.
• Choose Clinically-Validated Tools: Prioritize instruments with a track record in peer-reviewed research and established clinical use. For example, moving from a standard plastic goniometer to a dedicated digital goniometer with proven accuracy of ±1° improves the quality of ROM measurements [3]. To understand the specific benefits, you can explore a detailed comparison of digital versus traditional goniometers.
• Train Staff on Proper Handling: Ensure all clinicians are trained on the correct use, storage, and handling of measurement devices to prevent damage that could affect accuracy and necessitate premature recalibration.

3. Implement Pre-Measurement Quality Checks

Systematic verification before data collection is a non-negotiable step for ensuring that measurements are valid and reliable. Pre-measurement quality checks are a series of brief but critical procedures performed to confirm instrument readiness, correct patient setup, and an appropriate testing environment. By identifying and resolving potential issues before a measurement is taken, clinicians prevent wasted time, avoid collecting invalid data that requires re-testing, and strengthen the integrity of their clinical records.

Practical Testing Considerations

These checks act as the final gatekeeper for data quality. Issues like an uncalibrated force plate, incorrect patient positioning, or a dynamometer that hasn't been zeroed can introduce significant errors, rendering the data useless for tracking progress or making clinical judgments. For instance, a sports performance coach using portable force plates for a countermovement jump test must zero the plates before each athlete. Failure to do so could misrepresent ground reaction forces, leading to incorrect assumptions about an athlete's power output or landing asymmetry. Quality checks ensure that the data collected accurately reflects the patient's true state, a core tenet of evidence-based practice and one of the most important best practices for data collection.

Key Insight: Quality checks are not an optional step; they are an integral part of the measurement process itself. A measurement taken without prior verification is an assumption, not a validated data point.

Practical Implementation Strategies

• Create Pre-Test Checklists: Develop simple, visual checklists for each measurement station. A poster near the testing area can remind clinicians to confirm device calibration, verify patient positioning, and check environmental factors.
• Build Checks into Workflows: If using software or an app for data collection, configure it to prompt for verification steps before a measurement can be recorded. For example, a prompt could ask, "Has the handheld dynamometer been zeroed?"
• Schedule Regular Maintenance: Beyond daily checks, establish a formal schedule for equipment maintenance and calibration based on manufacturer guidelines and usage frequency. Document these events for compliance and quality assurance.
• Train for Understanding: Educate staff not just on how to perform checks but why each step is critical. Understanding the potential for error reinforces the importance of diligence and prevents procedural shortcuts. This ensures that every team member is committed to upholding high standards of data quality.

4. Define Clear Data Collection Objectives and Parameters

Effective data collection begins not with the measurement tool, but with a clear purpose. Defining specific, measurable objectives for why data is being collected is a foundational best practice that prevents gathering superfluous information. This approach ensures every measurement directly informs clinical decision-making, tracks meaningful progress toward a specific functional goal, or satisfies documentation requirements. Without clear goals, clinicians risk drowning in data that adds complexity to a case without providing real clinical insight, complicating workflows and obscuring patient outcomes.

Practical Testing Considerations

Establishing clear objectives transforms data collection from a routine task into a targeted clinical investigation. It forces the clinician to ask, "What question am I trying to answer with this measurement?" This focus is essential for evidence-based practice, as it connects each data point to a specific clinical hypothesis or treatment goal. For instance, in post-operative knee rehabilitation, an objective might be to "restore quadriceps strength to within 10% of the uninjured limb by week 12." This goal immediately dictates the need for regular, quantifiable strength testing, such as with a clinical-grade handheld dynamometer, and provides a clear benchmark for success.

Key Insight: Data without a defined purpose is just noise. Your objectives determine which metrics matter, guiding an efficient and clinically relevant data collection process that directly supports patient care and outcomes.

Practical Implementation Strategies

• Set Goals at the Outset: During the initial patient assessment, formally define the primary data collection objectives. Document these goals, including specific target values or milestones (e.g., achieve 120 degrees of active knee flexion by week four), directly in the patient's record.
• Use Decision Trees: Create simple flowcharts or decision trees that guide measurement selection based on clinical presentation. For example, if a patient presents with shoulder pain, the tree might direct the clinician to measure active and passive ROM first, and only proceed to strength testing if full, pain-free ROM is present.
• Involve the Patient: Share the measurement goals with the patient. Explaining that the objective is to track their strength gains or improvements in symmetry can increase their engagement and adherence to the treatment plan, making them an active participant in their recovery.
• Conduct Periodic Reviews: Re-evaluate the data collection objectives every few weeks or at key phases of rehabilitation. As a patient progresses, their goals will change, and the measurements needed to track them should be adjusted accordingly. This ensures the data collected always aligns with their current clinical status.

5. Ensure Proper Patient Positioning and Stabilization

Beyond protocol and device integrity, the physical orientation of the patient is a primary source of measurement variability. Establishing and consistently applying precise patient positioning, posture, and stabilization is fundamental to collecting reliable data. Any deviation in a patient's setup, however small, can alter muscle activation patterns, joint angles, and compensatory movements, introducing significant error that invalidates the measurement. This is one of the most critical best practices for data collection, particularly for assessments of range of motion and muscular force.

Practical Testing Considerations

Standardized positioning ensures that a measurement is truly assessing the intended physiological parameter, isolating the joint or muscle group of interest and minimizing contributions from other body segments. For example, during a handheld dynamometry test for shoulder abduction strength, failing to stabilize the trunk could allow the patient to use lateral flexion to generate force, artificially inflating the reading. Similarly, a ROM assessment using a dedicated digital goniometer must specify a consistent starting position, such as seated with the back supported and a 90/90 hip/knee angle, to ensure measurements are comparable across sessions. Without this rigor, data becomes unreliable for tracking progress or making clinical decisions.

Key Insight: Inconsistent positioning is a hidden variable that invalidates data. A change in measurement is only meaningful if the patient's setup is identical from one session to the next.

Practical Implementation Strategies

• Use Anatomical Landmarks: Anchor your positioning protocol to stable anatomical landmarks (e.g., ASIS, tibial tuberosity, acromion) to verify alignment before every test.
• Create Visual Aids: Display photographs or diagrams of correct patient positioning for key assessments in treatment areas. These serve as a quick and effective reference for all clinicians.
• Employ Positioning Tools: Use alignment guides, tape markers on the floor, or foam positioning blocks to create a repeatable testing environment that enforces consistency.
• Document and Photograph: Record the specific positioning details in the patient's file. For complex cases, taking a reference photograph during the initial assessment can ensure perfect replication in subsequent sessions.

6. Document Contextual Factors and Measurement Conditions

A measurement value rarely tells the whole story on its own. The context in which data is collected is fundamental to its interpretation, as numerous environmental, physiological, and psychological factors can influence patient performance. Documenting these conditions is one of the essential best practices for data collection, as it provides the necessary information to explain variability, make valid comparisons over time, and understand the true meaning behind the numbers. Without this context, a clinician might misinterpret a decrease in performance as a clinical regression when it was actually due to factors like patient fatigue or increased pain.

Practical Testing Considerations

Recording contextual factors transforms a simple data point into a rich piece of clinical evidence. It allows for a more nuanced analysis of trends, helping to differentiate between true physiological change and temporary fluctuations. For instance, if a patient's quadriceps strength measurement is 10% lower than the previous session, noting that they reported a pain level of 6/10 and had a poor night's sleep provides a clear, actionable explanation. This information guides the clinical response: perhaps the session should focus on pain management and recovery rather than aggressive strengthening. This level of detail supports more personalized and effective care.

Key Insight: Objective data points tell you what happened; contextual information helps explain why it happened. Combining both is crucial for accurate clinical reasoning and patient management.

Practical Implementation Strategies

• Standardize Contextual Fields: Create standardized fields within your data collection forms or electronic health records (EHR). Include prompts for pain level (e.g., VAS 0-10), fatigue (e.g., RPE 1-10), time of day, and recent physical activity.
• Pre-Test Checklists: Use a quick pre-assessment checklist to ask the patient about their current state. Questions can include "How was your sleep last night?" or "Have you experienced any unusual soreness since our last session?".
• Document Protocol Deviations: If a patient cannot achieve the standard testing position due to pain or stiffness, document both the deviation and the reason. For example: "Shoulder flexion measured in 45 degrees of abduction due to impingement pain in the standard neutral position."
• Review Context During Analysis: When reviewing a patient's progress over several weeks, always analyze the objective data alongside the corresponding contextual notes. This practice helps identify patterns, such as consistently lower strength readings during morning appointments, which may be related to stiffness.

7. Establish Measurement Reliability Testing and Validation

While standardized protocols lay the groundwork, measurement reliability testing validates that those protocols are producing consistent and trustworthy results. Reliability is the degree to which a measurement is free from error, ensuring that repeated tests under the same conditions yield the same outcome. Regularly assessing both inter-rater (between clinicians) and intra-rater (within the same clinician) reliability is a fundamental practice for any clinic committed to objective data. This process confirms that changes in patient data reflect true clinical progress, not variability in the measurement process.

Practical Testing Considerations

Unreliable measurements are clinically meaningless. They introduce noise that can lead to flawed clinical reasoning, such as prematurely progressing a patient or continuing an ineffective intervention. Formal reliability testing builds confidence in your data, supports evidence-based decisions, and strengthens your professional documentation. For example, an athletic training facility can validate its return-to-sport testing by having multiple staff members test an athlete with a clinical-grade handheld dynamometer and comparing results. This ensures that a reported 15% quadriceps strength deficit is a true finding, not an artifact of tester inconsistency. Effective data collection also demands robust documentation; understanding the principles of Clinical Documentation Improvement can significantly boost the quality of your records.

Key Insight: Reliability is not a one-time check; it is an ongoing process of verification. It proves that your measurement tools and protocols are performing as expected and that your team is applying them consistently.

Practical Implementation Strategies

• Schedule Regular Checks: Implement a schedule for formal reliability testing, such as quarterly or semi-annually. This makes it a standard operational procedure rather than an afterthought.
• Use a Consistent Subject: For inter-rater checks, use a single, stable individual (like a staff member) or a simulation model. This removes patient variability from the equation, isolating the consistency of the testers.
• Calculate Key Metrics: Use the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) to quantify reliability. An ICC value above 0.90 is typically considered excellent for clinical measurements, indicating a high degree of agreement [4].
• Document and Review Results: Track reliability scores over time. Share these results with staff to reinforce good practices and identify areas needing improvement or retraining. Investigating any measurement that falls below your target threshold is crucial for maintaining data quality.

8. Implement Data Entry Standardization and Digital Workflows

Shifting from manual, paper-based records to standardized digital workflows is a critical step in modernizing data collection. This practice involves establishing consistent formats for data entry, using common terminology, and employing digital systems that capture measurements accurately and efficiently. The primary benefit is a drastic reduction in transcription errors that plague manual systems, where a hastily written "145" can easily be misread as "115". Digital workflows ensure that the data collected is the data recorded, preserving its integrity from the point of measurement to the patient's permanent record.

Practical Testing Considerations

Standardized digital workflows are essential for creating clean, analyzable datasets. When every clinician enters data in the same format, it becomes straightforward to track longitudinal progress, compare outcomes across a patient population, and perform quality audits. For example, a rehabilitation facility can use an integrated app that automatically updates a patient's strength progression chart after each test with a handheld dynamometer. This immediate visualization not only supports clinical decision-making but also enhances patient education and motivation by providing clear, objective feedback on their recovery journey.

Key Insight: Digital workflows do more than just eliminate paperwork; they structure the data collection process itself, minimizing human error and unlocking the potential for immediate analysis and visualization.

Practical Implementation Strategies

• Choose Integrated Systems: Select digital tools that can connect directly with your existing EHR or EMR. This creates a seamless flow of information, eliminating the need for double entry and reducing administrative burden.
• Establish Data Validation Rules: Configure your software to automatically flag or reject impossible entries, such as a knee flexion angle of 200 degrees or a negative force value. This simple check acts as a first line of defense against data entry mistakes.
• Automate Trend Visualization: Use tools that automatically generate graphs and charts from measurement data. A clear physical therapy tracker showing a patient's progress over time is a powerful tool for communication and goal-setting.
• Provide Hands-On Training: Ensure all staff receive thorough, practical training on any new digital system. Conduct practice sessions using mock patient data to build confidence and competence before the system goes live.

9. Establish Longitudinal Tracking and Outcome Documentation

A single measurement provides a snapshot in time, but true clinical insight is revealed through the story that data tells over weeks and months. Longitudinal tracking is the systematic collection of key metrics at regular intervals throughout a patient's care journey. This process creates a detailed, objective record of progress, treatment effectiveness, and functional outcomes, moving beyond isolated data points to form a compelling clinical narrative.

Practical Testing Considerations

Consistent, long-term data collection is fundamental to evidence-based practice and demonstrating the value of your interventions. For a patient recovering from ACL reconstruction, for example, weekly tracking of knee flexion ROM and quadriceps strength provides objective evidence that the rehabilitation plan is working. This data is indispensable for justifying continued care to insurance providers, informing return-to-sport decisions, and motivating the patient by showing them tangible proof of their hard work. Without this ongoing documentation, progress becomes a matter of opinion rather than a matter of record.

Key Insight: Longitudinal data transforms clinical practice from a series of interventions into a data-driven journey. It provides the evidence needed to validate treatment choices, demonstrate value, and empower patients with a clear view of their recovery.

Practical Implementation Strategies

• Schedule Data Collection: Proactively book measurement sessions into the treatment schedule in advance. This ensures data is collected at consistent intervals (e.g., weekly, bi-weekly) and reinforces its importance as part of the standard care process.
• Visualize Patient Progress: Use the collected data to generate simple graphs or charts that clearly illustrate improvement over time. Sharing these visuals with patients is a powerful tool for enhancing engagement, adherence, and motivation.
• Set Data-Informed Milestones: Establish specific, measurable rehabilitation goals based on objective data, such as achieving 90% quadriceps strength symmetry or a certain degree of shoulder external rotation by a target date.
• Generate Outcome Reports: At the conclusion of a care episode, compile the longitudinal data into a formal outcome report. This document serves as a powerful record for the patient, the referring physician, and insurance payers. To streamline data handling and ensure consistency, leveraging robust digital workflow solutions is paramount.

10. Create Data Quality Control and Error Detection Procedures

Even with perfect protocols and calibrated devices, errors can still find their way into a dataset. Data quality control and error detection procedures act as a critical safety net, implementing systematic checks to identify and correct measurement errors, outliers, and inconsistencies. These processes are designed to catch data entry mistakes, transient equipment malfunctions, or momentary protocol deviations before they can influence clinical decisions or corrupt longitudinal patient records.

Practical Testing Considerations

Effective quality control transforms data from a raw input into a reliable clinical asset. It ensures that the information used for patient progress reports, return-to-sport decisions, and insurance documentation is accurate and trustworthy. For example, a system that automatically flags a shoulder external rotation measurement that deviates more than 15 degrees from the previous session prompts the clinician to re-test, where they might discover a simple data entry typo. Without this check, the erroneous data could lead to an incorrect assessment of progress and flawed adjustments to the patient's rehabilitation plan.

Key Insight: Proactive data quality control is not about finding fault; it's a systematic process for ensuring the integrity of clinical information. It protects both the patient and the practitioner from the consequences of acting on bad data.

Practical Implementation Strategies

• Define Normal Ranges: Establish expected value ranges for each measurement based on patient population, joint, or specific test. Modern software can use these ranges to set up automated alerts for values that fall outside typical physiological boundaries.
• Automate Anomaly Detection: Configure your data collection software to flag suspicious entries. This could include alerts for measurements that are significantly different from a prior test, duplicate entries within a single session, or force plate symmetry scores that are statistically improbable.
• Conduct Routine Audits: Implement a schedule for manual data spot-checks. A weekly review of 5-10% of recent measurements can uncover issues that automated systems might miss and helps reinforce staff diligence.
• Establish an Error Protocol: Train all staff on a clear, step-by-step process for investigating and correcting flagged data. This includes documenting the nature of the error, the correction made, and the reason for the initial mistake. This log can reveal patterns, such as a specific device needing recalibration or a clinician needing a protocol refresher, which is a key part of the best practices for data collection.

Objective Measurement in Modern Practice

Moving from subjective estimation to objective measurement marks a fundamental shift in clinical practice. The ten best practices for data collection detailed in this article are interconnected components of a single, powerful system designed to build a culture of precision and proof. Adopting these principles fundamentally changes how we assess patient progress, make clinical decisions, and demonstrate the value of our interventions. The journey begins with establishing standardized measurement protocols and committing to calibrated, validated instruments. These actions create a stable, trustworthy base for all subsequent measurements, minimizing the well-documented limitations of subjective assessments and replacing ambiguity with quantifiable certainty.

Applied Clinical Example

Consider a physiotherapist managing a patient 12 weeks post-ACL reconstruction. The goal is to objectively assess quadriceps strength to guide progression towards running. Instead of relying on manual muscle testing, the clinician uses a clinical-grade handheld dynamometer following a strict protocol for isometric testing at 90 degrees of knee flexion. The digital system captures peak force in Newtons and automatically syncs the data to the patient's file. This provides a quantifiable measure of strength and calculates the limb symmetry index, a critical metric for return-to-play decisions. This objective, reproducible data supports the clinical decision to either progress or modify the rehabilitation plan, enhances documentation quality, and provides the patient with clear, motivating feedback.

From Data Points to Defensible Decisions

Mastering these best practices for data collection elevates a practitioner's ability to create a clear, defensible clinical narrative. Practices such as documenting contextual factors, establishing measurement reliability, and implementing digital workflows are critical for this process. They ensure that data is not only high-quality at the point of capture but also remains contextualized and accessible for longitudinal tracking. A documented 15-degree improvement in knee flexion measured with a dedicated digital inclinometer, for instance, is far more powerful than a note simply stating "improved ROM."

This systematic approach offers several key benefits:

• Enhanced Clinical Confidence: Objective data provides a solid foundation for clinical reasoning, allowing you to justify treatment plans and return-to-play decisions with concrete evidence rather than professional opinion alone.
• Improved Patient Engagement: When patients can see their progress visualized through clear, objective data, they become more engaged and motivated in their own rehabilitation. Tracking strength gains with a handheld dynamometer or balance improvements on a force plate makes progress tangible.
• Robust Documentation: High-quality data serves as rigorous proof of care for insurance payers, referring physicians, and medico-legal purposes. It substantiates the clinical effectiveness of your interventions.

Ultimately, the consistent application of these data collection best practices separates modern, evidence-based practice from outdated methods. It transforms the role of the clinician from a skilled artisan to a clinical scientist. By prioritizing objective measurement, you not only improve individual patient outcomes but also contribute to a higher standard of care across the entire profession. The end goal is a practice where every decision is informed, every outcome is measurable, and every success is backed by proof.

---

For clinicians ready to integrate gold-standard measurement tools into their practice, Meloq provides the solutions needed to implement these best practices for data collection effectively. Our ecosystem of clinical-grade digital goniometers, handheld dynamometers, and portable force plates is designed for reliability, accuracy, and seamless integration into your workflow. Explore how Meloq can help you build a culture of objective measurement and data-driven decision-making in your clinic.

---

References

1. Hébert LJ, et al. A systematic review of the reliability of goniometric measurements in the clinical setting. Physiotherapy. 2015;101(1):1-10.
2. Bohannon RW. Manual muscle testing: does it meet the standards of an adequate screening test? Clinical Rehabilitation. 2005;19(6):662-667.
3. Gajdosik RL, Bohannon RW. Clinical measurement of range of motion: review of goniometry emphasizing reliability and validity. Physical Therapy. 1987;67(12):1867-1872.
4. Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155-163.